Peer review—the process by which academics evaluate new manuscripts involving new research—has long been a cornerstone of the academic publishing process. But are large commercial publishers ...

This workshop provides an introduction to the academic publishing process. Topics covered include journal selection, submission strategies, avoiding predatory publishers/journals, managing the ...

Opinions expressed by Digital Journal contributors are their own. Academic research is the backbone of discoveries and innovation in many fields of study. However, the journey from research to ...

Lamentations over the current models of academic publishing come from all corners of the scientific community. How does the system work? The scientist writes up the results of their study in the form ...

While the pressure to publish starts early in an academic’s career, RIT doctoral student Israa Thiab has a strategy to get the work done without the anxiety. Thiab, a student in the Golisano Institute ...

For decades, the peer review process in academic publishing has been considered the benchmark—ensuring that only the most rigorous research makes its way into the world. Yet, this model has remained ...

The perennial pressure to publish or perish is intense as ever for faculty trying to advance their careers in an exceedingly tight academic job market. On top of their teaching loads, faculty are ...

Publishing research from your thesis or dissertation is an essential step in contributing to academic knowledge, advancing your career, and enhancing institutional prestige. However, turning a lengthy ...

Prachee Avasthi suggests the peer-review process is somehow broken, a “scheme” that elevates credentials over the pursuit of discovery (“Academic Publishing Has Become a Racket,” op-ed, Sept. 15).

In an era where information is abundant but credibility is increasingly questioned, Nanjesh Bennur stands out as a leader focused not merely on publishing content, but on protecting the integrity of ...